Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sat, 5 Dec 1998 05:34:35 +0100 | From | ralf@uni-kobl ... | Subject | Re: Y2k compliance |
| |
On Fri, Dec 04, 1998 at 09:12:47AM -0600, S. Shore wrote:
> In fact, the year 2000 isn't a leap year. A little-known rule of leapyears > (iirc) is that any year divisible by 100 (i think) can't be a leapyear.
A lesser known rule is that years divisble by 400 are leapyears, though ...
Ralf
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |