lkml.org 
[lkml]   [1998]   [Dec]   [5]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: Y2k compliance
On Fri, Dec 04, 1998 at 09:12:47AM -0600, S. Shore wrote:

> In fact, the year 2000 isn't a leap year. A little-known rule of leapyears
> (iirc) is that any year divisible by 100 (i think) can't be a leapyear.

A lesser known rule is that years divisble by 400 are leapyears, though ...

Ralf

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:45    [W:0.297 / U:0.092 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site