Messages in this thread |  | | | Subject | Re: Article: IBM wants to "clean up the license" of Linux | | From | Andreas Schwab <> | | Date | 30 Dec 1998 10:51:10 +0100 |
| |
C S Hendrix <shendrix@escape.widomaker.com> writes:
|> In message <871zli7k6v.fsf@mulligatwani.msrl.com>, Michael Shields writes: |> |> > In article <199812291619.LAA09572@escape.widomaker.com>, |> > C S Hendrix <shendrix@escape.widomaker.com> wrote: |> > > If I put my software under GPL 2, I think it should be MY decision |> > > wether or not it goes to GPL 3. The paragraph above is saying that |> > > I agree to license my software by the terms of GPL 2, and any terms |> > > they decide to add later. |> > |> > Don't include that paragraph in your software, then. |> |> I didn't know you could custom-tailor the GPL to your uses.
You can use any words you like in your licences. It's the licencee that has to strictly follow them.
-- Andreas Schwab "And now for something schwab@issan.cs.uni-dortmund.de completely different" schwab@gnu.org
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |