lkml.org 
[lkml]   [1998]   [Dec]   [30]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: Article: IBM wants to "clean up the license" of Linux
From
Date
C S Hendrix <shendrix@escape.widomaker.com> writes:

|> In message <871zli7k6v.fsf@mulligatwani.msrl.com>, Michael Shields writes:
|>
|> > In article <199812291619.LAA09572@escape.widomaker.com>,
|> > C S Hendrix <shendrix@escape.widomaker.com> wrote:
|> > > If I put my software under GPL 2, I think it should be MY decision
|> > > wether or not it goes to GPL 3. The paragraph above is saying that
|> > > I agree to license my software by the terms of GPL 2, and any terms
|> > > they decide to add later.
|> >
|> > Don't include that paragraph in your software, then.
|>
|> I didn't know you could custom-tailor the GPL to your uses.

You can use any words you like in your licences. It's the licencee that
has to strictly follow them.

--
Andreas Schwab "And now for something
schwab@issan.cs.uni-dortmund.de completely different"
schwab@gnu.org

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:46    [from the cache]
©2003-2011 Jasper Spaans