Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 3 Dec 1998 10:56:13 +0100 | From | Romano Giannetti <> | Subject | Re: ATI Mach64 Kernel driver. |
| |
On Thu, Dec 03, 1998 at 01:50:19AM +0200, Antti Andreimann wrote: > On Wed, Dec 02, 1998 at 04:13:04PM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > > On Wed, 2 Dec 1998, Antti Andreimann wrote: > > > On Wed, Dec 02, 1998 at 12:47:28PM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > > > > IC. The support for Mach64 GX is far from complete. Mach64 CT/VT/GT should be > > > > OK. > > > How about Mach64 GP ? And why aren't Mach64 chips compatible to each other ? > > > Another misdesign from ATI ? > > > > > > Here is lspci for my card: > > > 00:10.0 VGA compatible controller: ATI Technologies Inc 215GP [Mach64 GP] (rev 5c) > > > > Mach64 GP is a 3D RAGE PRO, which is a Mach64 GT model and should work fine. > Umm. Oh sweet irony. It doesn't. With kernel framebuffer driver I mean. > aty_init will get segfault and lock up the whole kernel at boot. Maybe it's > because I have PCI version. Someone in the list mentioned that his AGP one > works fine. I can do some tests if it will help. Just tell me what to do.
... It seems to me that this is the bug I had (locking kernel at boot, I have an ATI RAGE IIC board), and that Philipp Rumpf (look at the Cc: list for the email) has ironed out. Now I have no time to test his latest/greatest patches, but probably some of you can help him.
Bye, Romano (in the role of thread-connecting-people :-))
-- Romano Giannetti, Professor - Univ. Pontificia Comillas (Madrid, Spain) Electronic Engineer - phone +34 915 422 800 ext 2410 fax +34 915 596 569
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |