lkml.org 
[lkml]   [1998]   [Dec]   [3]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: Linux timekeeping plans
Date
>>>>> "Colin" == Colin Plumb <colin@nyx.net> writes:
> Slaving the clock does require some care, but because the interrupt
> latency situation inside a single box is not nearly as messy as
> internet delays that NTP deals with, the algorithms aren't as

I must say (as an NTP user) that I don't understand: why don't you just
allow xntpd to use the RTC as a local clock and let xntpd slave ths system
clock with it ?

> The one thing that I'm still stuck on is SMP issues. While it appears
> that the TSC counters are kept synchronized by current SMP PC hardware,
> this is not guaranteed,

I seem to remember messages on this list a few weeks back stating fairly
clearly that several parts of Linux already rely critically on all TSC being
synchonized (and thus Linux ensuring that it is the case).


Stefan

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:45    [W:0.260 / U:0.816 seconds]
©2003-2014 Jasper Spaans. Advertise on this site