Messages in this thread | | | From | (david parsons) | Subject | Re: /dev/one - why not /dev/repeat? | Date | 29 Dec 1998 12:19:34 -0800 |
| |
In article <linux.kernel.36853719.95C2BCEC@psychosis.com>, Dave Cinege <dcinege@psychosis.com> wrote: >Tim Smith wrote: > >> Uhm, why can't the same compiler you'd use to build those kernel additions >> be used to build Riley's program? > >Because there is a problem fitting 200MB of development libraries in 2MB >of flash ram?
Why would you want to include development libraries?
Shoot, for something as simple as this you may not even need libc (though picking up the arguments may redefine non-portable.)
____ david parsons \bi/ And if you want to write a lkm, there's certainly \/ nothing stopping you except for kernel interface drift.
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |