Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 28 Dec 1998 09:00:21 +0100 | From | Lenart Gabor <> | Subject | Re: 2.1.132 Patch |
| |
On Wed, Dec 23, 1998 at 01:44:02PM +0000, Eyal Lebedinsky wrote: > Jeremy Katz wrote: > > > > If you were previously running a UP .131, you need to uncomment the line > > about SMP=1 in the Makefile before attempting to patch your tree. This is > > because .132 includes the config option for SMP and therefore patches that > > area of the Makefile, causing the patch to fail if it is not the same. > > On Tue, 22 Dec 1998 rdicaire@vic.com wrote: > > > > > Is it just me or has anyone noticed that the 2.1.132 patch, when applied, > > > still shows kernel version as 2.1.131, and that the background title in > > > make menuconfig also shows 2.1.131? > > Well, somethins WAS strange. I untarred a fresh 2.1.130, applied .131 > and .132 and > did the build (running .131 UP at the time). > > On bootup some errors flashed by about 'msdos' being the wrong version > (2.1.131) > but when a manual 'modprobe msdos' worked just fine. There was maybe > 5-10 messages > and they went by too fast to read.
I've got similar problem, because I has used 2.1.131 UP (so SMP=1 was marked out with '#') and patch couldn't patch Makefile because of this change. Restore Makefile to the 'official' state or patch Makefile by hand (I hope I'm right : you might want to change 131 to 132 and remove SMP=... and remarks before it, see the patch)
---[ LGB/DC ]------------[ University Of Veszprém ]------[ Lénárt Gábor ]--- "The truth is out there" "We're l{ea,i}ving together" "The future is dark." ---[ 88/422022(4602) ]---[ http://lgb.hal.vein.hu ]---------[ 87/477074 ]---
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |