Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: x11amp and 2.1.132 problem solved | Date | Sat, 26 Dec 1998 19:20:25 -0500 | From | "Brandon S. Allbery KF8NH" <> |
| |
In message <199812262356.SAA03433@escape.widomaker.com>, C S Hendrix writes: +----- | In message <199812262304.SAA03685@rushlight.kf8nh.apk.net>,Brandon S. Allbery | KF8NH writes: | > In message <Pine.LNX.4.04.9812261152590.280-100000@algonet.se>, Simon | > Ekstrand writes: | > | unlink("/tmp/00255aaa/.") = -1 EPERM (Operation not permitted) | > | unlink("/tmp/00255aaa/..") = -1 EACCES (Permission denied) | > | > Right there I conclude that x11amp is broken. *That* is sloppy coding. | > (And I'm amazed that nobody's inadvertently run x11amp as root and tried to | > use a skin... kiss the system goodbye!) | | Actually, it runs as root the way it is usually setup. Never hurt | a thing. +--->8
Through luck and the old directory error code. Try it under 2.1.132... (err, it'll still be safe; it'll get stuck on the "." infinite loop first). Horrible bletcherous ugliness.
| But yeah, looks sloppy. Wish we had the sources to it. +--->8
Upcoming, I do believe (and I can't wait; I want to port to Solaris so I can use it at work :-)
-- brandon s. allbery [os/2][linux][solaris][japh] allbery@kf8nh.apk.net system administrator [WAY too many hats] allbery@ece.cmu.edu carnegie mellon / electrical and computer engineering KF8NH We are Linux. Resistance is an indication that you missed the point.
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |