Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: /dev/one - why not /dev/repeat? | Date | Thu, 24 Dec 1998 13:06:26 -0400 | From | Horst von Brand <> |
| |
[...]
> That's legitimate, if you have an application that really would be > substantially faster with a /dev/random. What is this app, and can > you show benchmarks?
That's right! Show benchmarks, and we'll beat the blue sky out of them by careful use of an inlined RNG that _must_ beat the cost of doing a system call + assorted data copies + the actual RNG work. Besides, a program where the RNG is a significant fraction of the cost strikes me as quite odd...
The _only_ reason for /dev/{,u}random is as a (limited?) source of truly random bits (AFAIU, the distribution isn't even known to be nice at all!) -- Horst von Brand vonbrand@sleipnir.valparaiso.cl Casilla 9G, Viña del Mar, Chile +56 32 672616
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |