[lkml]   [1998]   [Dec]   [23]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: /dev/one - why not /dev/repeat?
In article <>,
Steve VanDevender <> wrote:
> Anyone who thinks /dev/one or /dev/~zero or /dev/repeat is
> something that needs to be implemented to fill a great need must
> be embarrassingly unfamiliar with basic UNIX utilities.

There is no need to insult people -- I suspect most are unaware that
the reason /dev/zero exists is not as a convenient stream of zeros to
be read, but as an infinite block to be mmap'd. If you don't
understand why /dev/zero is in the kernel then you will not understand
why /dev/one is not.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:46    [from the cache]
©2003-2014 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital Ocean