lkml.org 
[lkml]   [1998]   [Dec]   [18]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: NFS ...
Hi!

> * Performance could be better. A few hundred kB/s should be possible on a
> not to busy 10MBit network, should it? I often only saw 40kB/s, but the
> server machine was slow (486-100), too. Now with P-150, I see 100kB/s
> between two Linux systems, which is still a little low, isn't it?

Performance definitely should be _much_ better. 486DX4/100 is fast
enough machine for such tricks. Link is 100Mbit ethernet, everything
is loaded.

Tests are done with various big files (>1.5Meg). Speeds are in K/sec

Server 2.0.X, client 2.0.X

FTP:
server pentium/100, client pentium/100: 3700 (cache-cold), 5400
(cache-hot), 4100 (cache-cold), 4400 (cache-hot)

NFS:
server pentium/100, client pentium/100: 1186 [bogus because already in
clients cache?], 320 (cache-cold)

Oops, oops, nfs performance is really bad.

Pavel
--
The best software in life is free (not shareware)! Pavel
GCM d? s-: !g p?:+ au- a--@ w+ v- C++@ UL+++ L++ N++ E++ W--- M- Y- R+

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:46    [W:0.046 / U:5.480 seconds]
©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site