Messages in this thread | | | From | "Anthony Barbachan" <> | Subject | Re: pgcc optimizationss | Date | Thu, 17 Dec 1998 02:21:11 -0500 |
| |
-----Original Message----- From: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> To: Petko Manolov <petkan@varel.bg> Cc: alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>; pcg@goof.com <pcg@goof.com>; linut@squonk.net <linut@squonk.net>; linux-kernel@vger.rutgers.edu <linux-kernel@vger.rutgers.edu> Date: Wednesday, December 16, 1998 9:08 AM Subject: Re: pgcc optimizationss
>> True, but -O6 enables a lot of optimization that -O2 didn't. I prefer > >Last time I checked it seem to only add one thing for O3 and higher and >that was gratuitous inlining >
This doesn't seam the be the case any more. Last few times I have checked their web site there were many optimizations listed for the levels -O3 through -O6 and beyond. The last level of stable optimizations was -O6, last time I checked.
>> -O6 -fno-inline-functions (i don't like wild inlining too). Sadly this > >-fno-inline will stop all the inlining AFAIK, that'll break stuff > > > >- >To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in >the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu >Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ >
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |