lkml.org 
[lkml]   [1998]   [Dec]   [14]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    SubjectRe: PATCH: Raw device IO for 2.1.131
    From
    Date
    >>>>> "David" == David S Miller <davem@dm.cobaltmicro.com> writes:

    David> From: Jes Sorensen <Jes.Sorensen@cern.ch> Date: 14 Dec 1998
    David> 14:10:08 +0100

    David> Here is where I disagree with you, sendfile() is the right
    David> answer to pushing data to the wire, SGI's solution is not right
    David> and adds complexity to the kernel where it doesn't need to
    David> exist.

    > Provided that data is read directly from disk and put on the
    > wire, yes.

    David> And you were originally talking about fileserving and how Linux
    David> lacks there, and this is why I made the statement I did. Now
    David> you run off and say it is yet another application of data I/O
    David> that we need something other than sendfile for.

    Ok I should have mentioned that example in my previous posting. I
    agree that sendfile() solves some of the problems, but without having
    some sort of standard for it (afaik it's not accepted by POSIX or
    anything, I could be wrong, haven't checked properly) I will have a
    hard time telling people to use it - I will try though.

    Anyway sendfile() is a special case and doesn't solve the whole
    problem and as such I still think zero copy on write() is justified.

    Sorry for the confusion.

    Jes

    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:46    [W:0.023 / U:96.376 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site