[lkml]   [1998]   [Nov]   [7]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH] getsockname() always fails with EFAULT in 2.1.127pre7
    >And just a purely stupid question here.  Why would a kernel function set a
    >return value to something like -EFAULT or -EBADF when a user program would
    >check against that value with EFAULT or EBADF? Does the - not negate the
    >value? I'm not saying it's wrong LOL, because it works. But what does it
    >do why is it done that way?

    It's set to a -ve value to say that it's an error. The glibc system call
    wrappers flip it back to a positive value that the user sees. Return codes
    outside the range (-4095..0) are successful result codes.


    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:45    [W:0.019 / U:2.364 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site