Messages in this thread |  | | | Date | Sun, 8 Nov 1998 13:06:12 +1030 (CST) | | From | Michael Talbot-Wilson <> | | Subject | Halloween Memo (was ... Microsoft Open Source document) |
| |
Is this the document? If so, if this has been well discussed, I'm sorry to bother you... I came in at the discussion on receiving non-standard e-mail.
I received the following information in journalist Gareth Powell's e-mail newsletter. If you occasionally buy a selection real, paper "Internet" magazines you will have discovered the means of subscribing to Powell's letter.
Gareth Powell newses about the "Halloween Memo ... a 35 page confidential study" by a Microsoft program manager, Vinod Valloppillil, concerning Linux.
He says that Microsoft has replied officially to the leak via Ed Muth, enterprise marketing group manager at Microsoft, who admits the document was circulated at Microsoft in August but denies that it states an official Microsoft position.
To quote Powell, "The memo is talking of Linux as an open operating system -- OSS -- in that there is no charge and anyone can play. It shows that Microsoft is, at the very least, worried." The memo talks of the kinds of threats Linux poses to Microsoft. There are proximate threats, particularly the "platform threat ... in server space", and the strategic threat that arises because "the intrinsic parallelism and free-idea exchange in OSS has benefits that are not replicable with our current licensing model, and therefore present a long-term developer mind-share threat..." The memo continues, says Powell, "Recent case studies provide very dramatic evidence... that commercial quality can be achieved / exceeded by OSS projects... Linux is on track to eventually own the x86 Unix market..."
And, "The ability of the OSS process to collect and harness the collective IQ of thousands of individuals across the Internet is simply amazing. More important, OSS evangelization scales with the size of the Internet much faster than our own evangelization efforts appear to scale."
Now for the remedy proposed in the memo. Earlier in this (?) thread someone said that Microsoft would never try polluting Internet networking protocols because it was hard enough to get even simple ones to work. Well, this is only one recommendation circulating at Microsoft, but here it is, quoting Powell quoting the memo:
"[Open source software] projects have been able to gain a foothold in many server applications because of the wide utility of highly commoditized, simple protocols. By extending these protocols and developing new protocols, we can deny OSS projects' entry into the market."
I can't resist quoting Gareth Powell's own words in conclusion: "The people at Microsoft may be mainly bright -- although I was ever willing to listen to an argument against the proposition. But this memo shows that they are not nice people."
--Mike
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |