Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 6 Nov 1998 14:55:27 -0800 (PST) | From | David Lang <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] Patch to Memory Subsystem ... (Needed?) |
| |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
if this is a optional feature (even a compile-time option) this is fine. for small systems (read embedded, NC's , etc) 1MB may be a problem.
David Lang
On Fri, 6 Nov 1998, Brian Schau wrote:
> Date: Fri, 06 Nov 1998 22:01:17 +0100 > From: Brian Schau <bsc@fleggaard.dk> > To: Riley Williams <rhw@bigfoot.com> > Cc: Meelis Roos <mroos@tartu.cyber.ee>, linux-kernel@vger.rutgers.edu > Subject: Re: [PATCH] Patch to Memory Subsystem ... (Needed?) > > [ ... snip ... ] > R > > > > True, but the question's a serious one all the same. Just how LITTLE > > memory can root get away with to be able to log in, find the rogue > > processes, and kill one or two of them to free up memory? > > Hard to say. But with ram being cheap these days, who can't afford a > spare 1Mb? > (Which i think should be sufficient?) > > - > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ >
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: PGP for Personal Privacy 5.0 Charset: noconv
iQEVAwUBNkN+YT7msCGEppcbAQG6fAf8CfenHYXAyveZ3qdcBKXdgRx82AvtBT5z QxYCmlY15k0fDM8fvr2dKRFlZ92tUg6kl/NorTbpuCPG2cdxAfjNGcwIaRWvWoar lfENfBf6mrvhFb55DBbwQ2UNru4pGIJVP+km5Ws2qggVO+2EK/C7RKneLwYah0PS 5c1EcWwMCYMCE4nHuWGqkMPp22YF53XY/N1GCgbQqyAjKFEcLj8F+Gd9oQ4LqTjC EaHCa32N5v9/nxM2XwjTBwgkPL9xP4zmjh7GAOx+Rb7dLVAUObg/NLj9Hbo2FzDu SjDlROb6k4mpwUYxvtLWdSHMRiWXY8E75m11lCY3rdJhEn4BawiGIw== =pjIC -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |