lkml.org 
[lkml]   [1998]   [Nov]   [27]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: The history of the Linux OS
Hi there.

>> But we don't. 0.99.14, for example, is noticeably missing from
>> the list --- and I remember 0.99.14 very well because it was the
>> first kernel that was stable enough for production use by most
>> then Linuxers, marred only by small issues such as (IIRC) ATI and
>> S3 video cards vs. COM4. And it's right smack in the middle of the
>> list of released kernels.

> Ah yeah, the infamous COM4 bug with S3 chipsets. Seems some fuckwit
> used the usual COM4 I/O port as one of its I/O registers. Ahh, that
> particular chipset designer should have been taken out and made to
> use Microsoft products in eternity (with a Windows 95 Beta!).

I can't comment re the bug you mention since I've never experienced
it, but I can confirm that 0.99.14 (as well as the rest of the missing
0.99.* series) is now available from the kernel version history page
I've put up...

Best wishes from Riley.

---
* http://www.amush.ml.org/~rhw/kernel.versions.html

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:45    [W:0.294 / U:0.200 seconds]
©2003-2011 Jasper Spaans. Advertise on this site