[lkml]   [1998]   [Nov]   [25]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: Absolutely horrid IDE performance...
Brian Macy wrote:
> On /dev/hda:
> hdparm gives 6.68meg/sec
> On /dev/sda (a junker Seagate WSCSI on the Mylex controller:
> hdparm varies greatly between 2.5meg/sec and 4.5meg/sec
> time dd... gives 4.6meg/sec
> Can anyone explain the discrepancy? I can't see why there would be such a
> huge difference. From what I've experienced with 95/NT machines, the IBM
> UDMA drives are very fast. Linux even shows the system time required to be
> reasonable between SCSI/IDE... it just seems like the drive is just running
> slow (I thought it might be CPU overhead).

Nope. CPU overhead is less for IDE than for SCSI.

Upgrade to hdparm-3.5 so that you can display the
drive's current UDMA mode. The BIOS may have selected mode0
instead of the faster mode2.

Ooops.. wait a minute.. you said:

>ide: i82371 PIIX (Triton) on PCI bus 0 function 57

The Intel PIIX chip does not support UDMA.

Are you not running a kernel??? You should be!

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:45    [W:0.090 / U:11.184 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site