lkml.org 
[lkml]   [1998]   [Nov]   [21]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: Intel microcode fixes [OFF-TOPIC]
On Thu, 19 Nov 1998, Alex Buell wrote:
>On Thu, 19 Nov 1998, John Fulmer wrote:
>> Does Linux protect the cpu at all in this instance?
>
>Don't think so.

How could it? IIRC, the "new" microcode is stored in the flash rom with
the BIOS. One of the first things the machine does on startup is update
the microcode. Linux isn't even in existance at that time.

You can't have the kernel reset the processor, because I'll just rewrite
the reset commands in the malicious microcode to noop.

Can of worms indeed. Anyone know if the mainframers thought of this?

Pat

--
Patrick St. Jean '97 XLH 883 psj@cgmlarson.com
Programmer & Systems Administrator +1 713-977-4177 x115
Larson Software Technology http://www.cgmlarson.com


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:45    [W:0.149 / U:0.300 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site