lkml.org 
[lkml]   [1998]   [Nov]   [20]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: Linux V2.1.128 localhost performance
Tigran Aivazian wrote:
>
> On Wed, 18 Nov 1998, Richard B. Johnson wrote:
>
> ...
> > One can't `ping -f localhost` anymore either. Is this a bug or a
> > feature? If a feature, was X considered?
> ...
>
> Richard,
>
> I thought X uses PF_UNIX (UNIX domain) sockets rather than TCP to localhost
> (unless one is insisting by doing DISPLAY=localhost:0.0), so although
> performance degradation is always bad, X is not under any threat.
>
> I also noticed 98% packet loss when doing ping -f localhost on 2.1.127.
>
> Regards,
> Tigran.

correct me if I'm wrong, but wasn't there a thread about this a few
months back that resolved the ping -f localhost as a ping bug.

Something about ping counted the ICMP replies as sends as well?

Regards,
Steve

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:45    [W:0.103 / U:0.396 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site