lkml.org 
[lkml]   [1998]   [Nov]   [13]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: prev->has_cpu
On Fri, 13 Nov 1998, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:

>Does this patch make sense or I have slept too little this night ;-)?

This should be the right patch....
*** linux/kernel/sched.c~ Fri Nov 13 11:37:39 1998
--- linux/kernel/sched.c Fri Nov 13 11:39:06 1998
***************
*** 604,620 ****
}
}
- #ifdef __SMP__
- next->has_cpu = 1;
- next->processor = this_cpu;
- #endif
-
if (prev != next) {
kstat.context_swtch++;
get_mmu_context(next);
switch_to(prev,next);
}
spin_unlock(&scheduler_lock);

/*
--- 604,622 ----
}
}
if (prev != next) {
kstat.context_swtch++;
get_mmu_context(next);
+ #ifdef __SMP__
+ next->processor = this_cpu;
+ #endif
switch_to(prev,next);
}
+ #ifdef __SMP__
+ prev->has_cpu = 1;
+ #endif
+
spin_unlock(&scheduler_lock);

/*

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:45    [from the cache]
©2003-2014 Jasper Spaans. Advertise on this site