lkml.org 
[lkml]   [1998]   [Nov]   [13]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: e2fsck...
On Thu, 12 Nov 1998, Theodore Y. Ts'o wrote:

[...]
> Multics did allow on-line salvaging of volumes, and it is theoretically
> possible to do such a thing. But it requires that the filesystem
> checker lock out kernel changes, and the filesystem checker would have
> to be in close communication with the kernel while it went about its
> business. E2fsck and the kernel both don't have the necessary
> infrastructure to do this today.

I recall that recently someone (I don't remember who just right now)
proposed some sort of snapshot device for filesystems. So that when you
access a snapshot you lock the filesystem and you can backup it. The
changes to the fs are recorded in a temporary partition (raw or e2fs or
the-same-as-the-shapshotted ?) and the /dev/sda1snapshot is synced, locked
and ready for backup (may be umounted ? Hmm ... I think better remounted
readonly). This way you can even 'e2fsck /dev/sda1snapshot'. Filesystem
snapshots seems a really good idea and the filesystem checker have not to
be in close communication with the kernel while doing its job.

Of course this raise a lot of other problems. For example what about
eating up all the temporary partition ? You have plenty of space on the
real partition but the temporary one is too little and fill up very fast.
The result should be a filesystem full or the kernel is allowed to
allocate more space on other partitions for saving the diff data ?

Ciao,
Riccardo.



-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:45    [W:0.051 / U:15.156 seconds]
©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site