lkml.org 
[lkml]   [1998]   [Nov]   [11]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] Compilation fixes for 2.1.127
>>>>> "Andi" == Andi Kleen <ak@muc.de> writes:

Andi> No. The proper way to communicate such things to higher
Andi> layers is over the destination entry (e.g. that is how path
Andi> mtu discovery is handled). The higher layers pick the
Andi> condition up as soon as they access the dst_entry again -
Andi> usually with the next packet which is the first time such a
Andi> link failure is interesting anyways.

Will the dst entry also affect protocols that use dev_queue_xmit()
method? And is the latter obsolete and should be replaced with the
destination output method as done in ipv[46]?

Henner


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:45    [W:0.080 / U:0.280 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site