Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 11 Nov 1998 20:27:45 +0100 | From | Henner Eisen <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] Compilation fixes for 2.1.127 |
| |
>>>>> "Andi" == Andi Kleen <ak@muc.de> writes:
Andi> No. The proper way to communicate such things to higher Andi> layers is over the destination entry (e.g. that is how path Andi> mtu discovery is handled). The higher layers pick the Andi> condition up as soon as they access the dst_entry again - Andi> usually with the next packet which is the first time such a Andi> link failure is interesting anyways.
Will the dst entry also affect protocols that use dev_queue_xmit() method? And is the latter obsolete and should be replaced with the destination output method as done in ipv[46]?
Henner
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |