Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 8 Oct 1998 11:41:36 +0100 (GMT) | From | Mike <> | Subject | Re: 3rd Party Patches / patches directory |
| |
On Thu, 8 Oct 1998, Clifford Wolf wrote:
> > On Thu, 8 Oct 1998, Mike wrote: > > > > Locally is ment as on the server of the patches archive. Remote in this > > > meaning would be on the site of the maintainer of this patch. The idea > > > is that the maintainer only needs to update the description file on > > > his download page - the server which holds the patch archive updates his > > > copies automatically (lets say every 4 hours - this files are not big). > > > > Ah, OK. I was misunderstanding you. Maybe the patch maintainer could > > have some way of triggering the script to be run whenever he updates > > something? Checking all the patches every 4 hours would presumeably > > generate a significant amount of unneeded traffic, and might there be > > problems if servers go down? > > I don't see so much traffic for this. Since bugfixes are not allowed I > don't thing that there will be more than a maximum of a few hundret
Yeah, but a few hundred HTTP/FTP connections coming from a single machine all at once, completely unecesarily, is a waste of bandwidth. OK, maybe not all that much, but I would have thought it would be enough that you'd notice it.
> patches. HTTP and FTP support updates - this means that the file is only > downloaded again if there is _really_ a newer version of it. Otherwise
True.
-- Mike <rickettm@ox.compsoc.net>
"Those who believe in astrology are living in houses with foundations of Silly Putty." - Dennis Rawlins, astronomer
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |