[lkml]   [1998]   [Oct]   [8]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH] NIPQUAD macro broken on big endian
In article <>,
Roderich Schupp <> wrote:
>Linus Torvalds <> said:
>> - it's not so much slowness as code expansion (NIPQUAD is only used
>> by various printk's, so performance per se is secondary)
>So why not teach the kernel's vsprintf a new format code and
>get rid of this hack? (Wasn't such a format in the kernel at one time?)

There was.

I got rid of it, because it's unusable. It means that you can't have gcc
warn about printf() misuses, and they are a lot more important to me
than adding a random format code.


To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:44    [W:0.036 / U:0.520 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site