lkml.org 
[lkml]   [1998]   [Oct]   [6]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: (dumb?) idea for kernel oops...
Date

>
> I was thinking about when the kernel hangs or otherwise dies with an
> oops...what's to keep it from saving the crash info in a known memory
> location and restarting the kernel from scratch? Its dead anyway, so
> its not like you're going to lose any information...but you might be
> able to save some.

Why don't we just make the kernel stable instead? :) Instead of saying
"Oh, it will just recover itself in case of a hang" we should be thinking
"It will not hang"

Just my $0.02



<snip>


James Willard
james@cows.ml.org

--
#!/bin/perl -sp0777i<X+d*lMLa^*lN%0]dsXx++lMlN/dsM0<j]dsj
$/=unpack('H*',$_);$_=`echo 16dio\U$k"SK$/SM$n\EsN0p[lN*1
lK[d2%Sa2/d0$^Ixp"|dc`;s/\W//g;$_=pack('H*',/((..)*)$/)
.,-=-,.,-=-,.,-=-,.,-=-,.,-=-,.,-=-,.,-=-,.,-=-,.,-=-,.,-=-,.,-=-,.,-=-,.,-=-,
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:44    [from the cache]
©2003-2011 Jasper Spaans. Advertise on this site