[lkml]   [1998]   [Oct]   [27]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: 2.2.0 and egcs 1.1 was Re: Sorry, wrong gcc-version
    On Tue, 27 Oct 1998, Marcin Dalecki wrote:
    > BTW. Linus and Alan are utterly wrong in theyr bashing of egcs. The single
    > one sufficient reason which gratifies the usage of egcs over gcc-2.7.x is:
    > Actually *usable* and standard adherent C++ support. (However there are

    The kernel doesn't contain any single line of C++. scripts/ is not
    the kernel.

    > some other resons too). Therefore it's really a pitty that one can't use
    > the stable 2.0.xx with it...

    That's why Debian comes with the old gcc, and egcs g++.



    Geert Uytterhoeven
    Wavelets, Linux/{m68k~Amiga,PPC~CHRP}
    Department of Computer Science -- Katholieke Universiteit Leuven -- Belgium

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:45    [W:0.029 / U:0.564 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site