Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sun, 25 Oct 1998 15:59:10 +0000 (GMT) | From | Riley Williams <> | Subject | Re: ARMS WAVING!!! Proposal to fix /proc dainbrammage. |
| |
Hi there.
>>> Time formats:
>>> It seems to me that expressing the time constants in /proc would >>> be as simple as:
>>> <seconds>.<microseconds>
>> Yes. Some of the stuff already does this (not microseconds, but >> look at "uptime" for example.
> Noted, however this is only accurate to 1/100th of a second. I > would rather be timeval compliant, as things like TCP timestamps > and such utilize this. If we change the format, we should make > everything compliant, even uptime.
Why not be sensible and specify times as decimal seconds, using as many decimal places as are relevant?
Certainly, if I saw a time specified as 4.6 then I'd assume 4,600ms rather than 4,006ms as appears to be proposed...
Best wishes from Riley.
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |