![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
On Wed, Oct 21, 1998 at 03:34:57AM +0200, David S. Miller wrote: > I do agree however that all of these sort of items should be unified > into one sysconf() interface. We were just lucky on Sparc and > inherited the system call from SunOS etc. I think read-only sysctls are doing this fine. glibc has to implement a sysconf wrapper for various reasons anyways, and then it can just call sysctl(2). Another advantage is that it doesn't add any new code to the kernel, just a few small sysctl table entries (and if that is not enough sysctl is flexible enough to support arbitary functions) -Andi - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2005-03-22 13:45 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||