lkml.org 
[lkml]   [1998]   [Oct]   [20]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [more markup]  [less markup]  [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
DateTue, 20 Oct 1998 05:41:56 +0200 (CEST)
FromMOLNAR Ingo <>
SubjectRe: -EFAULT on invalid pointer
On Tue, 20 Oct 1998, Chris Wedgwood wrote:

> I looked at this a couple on months back (and posted something to
> security audit about some concerns I had).
> 
> Basically... if you pass bogus addresses and pointers to the kernel,
> depending on what OS and version you are running, you might get an
> EFAULT and you might not.

no, it's a quality of implementation issue. Also it's a usability issue,
bugs detected should be reported back to user-space. It's _not_ a valid
excuse that if it's not defined explicitly in POSIX or that other OSs are
less careful.

Also, it can be used by user-space too, if a memory-management software
(such as a C++ wrapped garbage collector or whatever) maps/unmaps certain
areas of memory, the pointer could be invalid because say that page is
marked read-only, but user-space has the right to detect this. Thus such
'temporarily invalid pointers' detected by the kernel as 'invalid pointer'
can be turned into a 'valid pointer' by user-space wrapping functions. (i
dont think there is any such package for Linux right now) 

-- mingo


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:45    [from the cache]
©2003-2008