[lkml]   [1998]   [Oct]   [18]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: Dynamic IP hack (PR#294)
> Yes. If it were programmed accurately I had no reasons to object.
> About established state: no IFF_DYNAMIC will help you: established
> is established.

There are only two cases that seem relevant

1. Shifting unbound source on a connect() when routing changes. Thats
a nice idea anyway

2. Killing connections on a drop. This potentially violates the RFC
check rules on time wait unless you are very careful. Also tell me
why it cant be done in user space by turning /proc/net/ into a set
of temporary 'reject' filter rules


To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:45    [W:0.105 / U:4.144 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site