lkml.org 
[lkml]   [1998]   [Oct]   [18]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: jiffies wraparound
Date
> >> by zero, the 2.1.126 time code survived this quick 'time travel' without
> >> problems. Apart from processes getting killed during wraparound, there is
> >> no big problem, is there?
> >
> >Im losing the entire tty subsystem for good when this occurs
>
> Alan did you removed all wrap fixes from sched.c ? The tty subsystem think
> that -1 means after a lot, while if you fix the wrap bug -1 go in the
> past.

If I drop the wrap fixes from sched.c and fix the sd fixes everything looks
good. Im now trying to test each one I have hardware for


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:45    [W:0.245 / U:0.516 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site