![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
On Thu, 15 Oct 1998, Bill Hawes wrote: > The dquot allocation isn't allowed to fail, so the stuck processes were waiting > for dquots to be freed. > > You didn't mention what value dquot-max was set to, but my guess is that it's way > to low for what is probably a very busy server. Try upping the available dquots > and see if that helps. I have also had to raise the limit on our webservers here...Is there anything wrong with setting the initial limit to something like 4096 or even higher? It only gets allocated when needed, correct? It's also not something a user is going to be able to abuse...or is it? Simon- | Simon Kirby | Systems Administration | | mailto:sim@netnation.com | NetNation Communications | | http://www.netnation.com/ | Tech: (604) 684-6892 | - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2005-03-22 13:45 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||