Messages in this thread |  | | | Date | Thu, 15 Oct 1998 16:00:34 +0200 | | From | Alexander Kjeldaas <> | | Subject | Re: "per-process" limits (was: Showstopper list) |
| |
On Wed, Oct 14, 1998 at 03:15:05PM +0200, Mikael Pettersson wrote: > > The first problem doesn't occur if credential changes are > broadcast instead of being physically shared. > Both problems could be fixed if the relevant procedures in the > kernel would take explicit "effective credentials" parameters > instead of retrieving them from the task struct. >
If you can manage to do this without any significant performance degradation, I think it is a very good idea. access() is currently a hack.
astor
-- Alexander Kjeldaas, Guardian Networks AS, Trondheim, Norway http://www.guardian.no/
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |