Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 16 Oct 1998 11:13:52 -0400 (EDT) | From | Garth R Goodson <> | Subject | Re: LSF and SOCK_PACKET |
| |
Yeah I screwed up. I didn't realize that only socket level setsockopts were generic.
On another note:
Has anyone given any thought to having a BIND_TO_TCP_PORT type option for SOCK_PACKET?
The reason I ask that if one wanted to use SOCK_PACKET for more than traffic monitoring (ie. user level networking) this would be a very useful feature (although it could be argued it breaks all kind of layer abstractions).
I would be interested in hearing the best ways of going about this.
-Garth
Excerpts from mail: 16-Oct-98 Re: LSF and SOCK_PACKET by Andi Kleen@muc.de > of the LL/DL code) in 2.1. Then SO_ATTACH_FILTER/ > SO_DETACH_FILTER are generic socket options that are handled by > core/sock.c for all socket types, the receiving filter is in include/net/sock.h > (that is what I missed in my first mail).
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |