lkml.org 
[lkml]   [1998]   [Oct]   [13]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    SubjectRe: "per-process" limits (was: Showstopper list)
    Date
    From
    >Dean Gaudet writes:
    >On Mon, 12 Oct 1998, Paul Barton-Davis wrote:
    >
    >> "Per process" limits for anything under Linux are difficult to
    >> envisage in a world of multi-threaded processes.
    >
    >Share a pointer to struct process_limits. Another level of indirection
    >solves yet another problem...

    Indeed. Except that I'm interested in a more general solution to the
    problem of the missing kernel abstraction. Linux currently has no
    notion of "a group of tasks"; such an abstraction is both useful for
    process limits, and lots of other things as well.

    --p

    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:45    [W:4.339 / U:0.340 seconds]
    ©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site