Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [ME TOO] Re: Linux-2.1.125 ... pre-2.2 imminent - SCSI issues | Date | Mon, 12 Oct 1998 16:33:49 -0400 | From | Shannon Hendrix <> |
| |
In message <Pine.LNX.3.96.981012021726.5498C-100000@52-a-usw.rb1.blv.nwnexus.ne t>, Tim Smith writes:
> On Mon, 12 Oct 1998, Shannon Hendrix wrote: > > The 53x700 eats CPU, the Adaptec seems better in this case, even > > the 1540B which has no CPU. > > I don't understand why a 53x700 would eat CPU. Are you sure you don't > mean a 53x400?
Perhaps. I have an NCR 53c810 in my Alphastation that seems to use a lot. Hard to tell because top and vmstat don't agree on certain stats.
Is the 700 a better controller than the 810?
-- csh - shendrix@widomaker.com - http://www.widomaker.com/~shendrix/myresume.html ---------------------------------------------------------------------- "We have nothing to prove" -- Alan Dawkins
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |