Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sun, 11 Oct 1998 06:55:51 -0700 (MST) | From | Ely Wilson <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] plip.c in 2.1.125 |
| |
I had thought someone would react adversely to the change in the timeout delay count. I changed it back to 3000 here since it didn't seem to make a difference eiterh way with teh otehr change (PLIP_DEBUG making CPP time decisions about teh timeout printk) and _DEBUG = 0.
At any rate, was the rest of it a mistake? I'm hoping not, my aim was to get rid of the display corrupting timeout messages. Not fine tune the source to a 486.
%---* ely % Gee, if i were only here to _see_ this.
On Sun, 11 Oct 1998, Alan Cox wrote: > > Hmm, beyond all obvious, i added 1500 usecs to the timout delay to reduce > > Please don't retune plip for your own machine. Its currently about right > for generic machines, and the timeouts are tunable with plipconfig >
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |