Messages in this thread |  | | | Date | Thu, 01 Oct 1998 19:16:31 -0500 | | From | Doug Ledford <> | | Subject | Re: aic7xxx testers needed |
| |
Michael Kunze wrote: > > > >The aic7xxx-5.1.0-pre13 driver has just been released. This driver is what > > >I consider to be a final release candidate (except the debugging stuff is > > >still enabled). I would ask as many people as possible to please try this > > >version of the driver out and let me know if you have problems. If I don't > > >here back from people that there are problems in this driver, then it will > > >shortly become the official aic7xxx-5.1.0 driver for linux. > > > > I've tested the driver with Linux 2.1.123 on an Asus P2B-LS and it seems to > work. What makes me wonder is that during the boot process the driver claims > running with 80 Mbyte synchronous: > > 4>scsi0 : Adaptec AHA274x/284x/294x (EISA/VLB/PCI-Fast SCSI) 5.1.0pre13/3.2.4 > <4> <Adaptec AIC-7890/1 Ultra2 SCSI host adapter> > <4>scsi : 1 host. > <4>scsi : aborting command due to timeout : pid 1, scsi0, channel 0, id 0, lun > 0 > 0x12 00 00 00 ff 00 > <4>SCSI host 0 abort (pid 1) timed out - resetting > <4>SCSI bus is being reset for host 0 channel 0. > <6>(scsi0:0:0:0) Synchronous at 80.0 Mbyte/sec, offset 15. > <4> Vendor: IBM Model: DGHS09V Rev: 03C0 > <4> Type: Direct-Access ANSI SCSI revision: 03 > > If i take a look into /proc/scsi/aic7xxx/0, i see
Pre15 should fix the reset at startup thing, and it slightly changes the parsing of the device settings and may also fix the negotiation stuff you are seeing here.
> Statistics: > (scsi0:0:0:0) > Device using Wide/Async transfers. > ^ ^ ^ ^ > Device Negotiation Settings > Period Offset Bus Width > User 000 000 1 > Goal 000 000 1 > Current 000 000 1 > Total transfers 3595 (3370 read;225 written) > blks(512) rd=16267; blks(512) wr=654 > > So, what is the REAL transfer mode? 80 Mbyte/s synchronous or 20 MByte/s or > less asynchronous? > > BTW: Doug should clean up his patch for 2.1.123. I've got a rejection for hunk > 219 and had to clean up manually.
You shouldn't have any failed patches, they apply cleanly here for me against a pristine 2.1.123 tree.
--
Doug Ledford <dledford@dialnet.net> Opinions expressed are my own, but they should be everybody's.
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |