lkml.org 
[lkml]   [1998]   [Jan]   [9]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: devlinks: an alternative to devfs
On Thu, Jan 08, 1998 at 12:00:34PM +0100, ketil@ii.uib.no wrote:
> But you want the devices that disappear during unloading of a kernel
> module to reappear when the module is reloaded. And you want to be able
> to mount/unmount the directory at will without having to run some script
> to configure the correct devices - don't you?

Yes, but the devfs already has the ability to remember non-existant devices
so that you can chmod a device that is yet to be added. Basically, my
'nocreate' flag to the filesystem could be called anything else and the
semantics of it should be (and I think can be) exactly what we want for
chrooted filesystems.

--
[======================================================================]
[ Kevin Lentin Email: K.Lentin@cs.monash.edu.au ]
[ finger kevinl@fangorn.cs.monash.edu.au for PGP public key block. ]
[ KeyId: 06808EED FingerPrint: 6024308DE1F84314 811B511DBA6FD596 ]
[======================================================================]

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:41    [W:0.030 / U:2.184 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site