lkml.org 
[lkml]   [1998]   [Jan]   [8]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: devlinks: an alternative to devfs
On Thu, Jan 08, 1998 at 05:56:51PM +1100, Richard Gooch wrote:
>
> But, as I've already said, tar doesn't store whatever magic is needed
> to tell the FS driver that this symlink is really a devlink.

It's worse than that. Current filesystems don't let you fiddle with the
permission bits on a symlink. I had hoped we could just set a permission
bit on the symlink and then everything else would be handled invisibly. But
my experiments earlier seem to show that playing with symlink permissions
just doesn't work currently. I thought you could do it in C.

--
[======================================================================]
[ Kevin Lentin Email: K.Lentin@cs.monash.edu.au ]
[ finger kevinl@fangorn.cs.monash.edu.au for PGP public key block. ]
[ KeyId: 06808EED FingerPrint: 6024308DE1F84314 811B511DBA6FD596 ]
[======================================================================]
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:41    [from the cache]
©2003-2011 Jasper Spaans. Advertise on this site