lkml.org 
[lkml]   [1998]   [Jan]   [7]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: Y2k - Is Linux Ready for the year 2000?
On Jan 06, Richard B. Johnson wrote:

> > Machines physically have problems. The RTC for example, may not work.
> > This may be at least in part a kernel issue.
>
> Not true. Read the documentation. The current year at offset 0x09, is a
> byte in BCD. The current CENTURY at offset 0x32 is a byte in BCD. This
> allows time to be kept to 9999. Even the BIOS allows it to be set to
> 2099 which is greater than the BIOS time can be kept (2033).

the RTC on my ASUS SP3G switches from Dec 31 1999 to Jan 1 1900.

yes, I can set the date to 2000 in the BIOS setup but this doesn't
help for automatic transission (I don't care anyway as the PC is
running all the time and I synchronize both the system clock and RTC
with a radio clock (but this is still only half of the truth as the
radio clock time format (DCF77 in germany) only submits 2 digits for the
year so I'll have to check my receiver/decoder programs within the next
two years for Y2K-conformance; does anyone know if xntpd with raw dcf77
(parse driver) is Y2K-proof?)).



Harald
--
All SCSI disks will from now on ___ _____
be required to send an email notice 0--,| /OOOOOOO\
24 hours prior to complete hardware failure! <_/ / /OOOOOOOOOOO\
\ \/OOOOOOOOOOOOOOO\
\ OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO|//
Harald Koenig, \/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/
Inst.f.Theoret.Astrophysik // / \\ \
koenig@tat.physik.uni-tuebingen.de ^^^^^ ^^^^^

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:41    [W:0.066 / U:0.096 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site