Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: no need for a devfs | Date | Wed, 07 Jan 1998 11:54:37 -0500 | From | Christophe Dupre <> |
| |
> > Well, you would have to rerun makedev software every time module is > inserted. Advantage of devfs was that it was up-to-date without > needing to run makedev after every change. devfs also might have > chance to solve scsi naming problems.
What would be good also would be a mount/umount suite using /proc/mounts instead of /etc/mtab... :-)
Oh well, I'll probably just do that someday...
| |