lkml.org 
[lkml]   [1998]   [Jan]   [3]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: PROPOSAL: /proc/dev
James Mastros writes:
> > I've had a closer look and I think we can avoid creating an inode for
> > each /dev entry.
> Ahh, good. I'm currently writing a memfs (IE automaticly growing and
> shrinking fs in ram only (nonpersistant without userlevel help)); I'm going
> to finish it and then extend it to a devfs. I hope you share your inodeless
> plan with me... (hint, hint...)

I'm still working out how the VFS works. I'm not sure how much
commonality there would be between memfs and devfs. I was going to
evolve a testfs (where I can learn about things) to a devfs. However,
if you're set on writing one yourself...
Once I understand what I'm doing I can show you what I have in mind
;-)

Regards,

Richard....

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:41    [W:0.100 / U:0.264 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site