![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
> On Mon, 26 Jan 1998, Erik Corry wrote: > > In article <m0xwvSv-0005FsC@lightning.swansea.linux.org.uk> you wrote: > > > [Is it a digital, intel or compaq StrongARM nowdays ??] > > Sold to Intel. > > Isn't the proper terminology "assimilated"? > I run the StrongARM applications software group in Reading, England. I would not say assimilated. Speaking as me (a habit I've picked up from Maddog) Linux is important enough to me to be a criteria for job acceptance. That is, no Linux work, no me. As an aside, ARM themselves are extremely supportive of Linux and of Free Software (ie GNU tools). For example, I ported the ARM compiler, assembler and debugger to Intel Linux for them. I'm not sure when/how they'll release that but they're interested in Linux hosted work if they see demand. StrongARM is itself a trademark so it's ok just to say 'StrongARM' but in a little while it will be 'Intel StrongARM'. > -Dan ---------------------------------------------------------------------- David A Rusling Consulting Engineer European Semiconductor Applications Digital Equipment Co Ltd., Engineering PO Box 121, Imperial Way, Worton Grange Reading RG2 0TU Linux, Alpha, StrongArm, PCI Tel: UK-(0)1734-204380 Fax: UK-(0)1734-203133 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2005-03-22 12:41 [W:0.251 / U:1.030 seconds] ©2003-2008 Jasper Spaans | |||||||||||||