![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
> My question is: is it a problem in the way Linux handles the cache ?? > It would have to do with the MMU, and since the OS is the one who > controls it ... and since NT hasn't failed to detect the board ... It shouldnt be - caching on the PC is handled by hardware. It may also be that the cyzload program doesnt wait long enough before checking the byte. Why not check with cyclades. Alan | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2005-03-22 12:41 [W:0.090 / U:0.970 seconds] ©2003-2008 Jasper Spaans | |||||||||||||