Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sat, 24 Jan 1998 20:40:04 -0800 (PST) | From | Gerhard Mack <> | Subject | Re: device allocated to {14,5}, {14,7}, {14,9} |
| |
On Sat, 24 Jan 1998, James Mastros wrote:
> On Sat, 24 Jan 1998, C. Scott Ananian wrote: > > On Sat, 24 Jan 1998 hpa@transmeta.com (H. Peter Anvin) wrote: > > > /dev/dsp16 seems reasonable to me, and seems to have been the intent > > > given the above defines. > > > > /dev/dsp16 is fine for the first device, but the dsp port on the second > > channel/card then becomes /dev/dsp161, which is somewhat unsatisfactory. > > /dev/dsp16a, /dev/dsp16b works, but is rather unstandard. > Why not /dev/dsp16-2 (not that it's a very important issue -- how many > computers have two sound cards)? > Bielieve it or not I've seen more than one machine with a sb and a gus.
Gerhard Mack<gmack@imag.net> --
As a computer I find your faith in technology amusing.
| |