[lkml]   [1998]   [Jan]   [24]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: device allocated to {14,5}, {14,7}, {14,9}
On Sat, 24 Jan 1998, C. Scott Ananian wrote:
> On Sat, 24 Jan 1998 (H. Peter Anvin) wrote:
> > /dev/dsp16 seems reasonable to me, and seems to have been the intent
> > given the above defines.
> /dev/dsp16 is fine for the first device, but the dsp port on the second
> channel/card then becomes /dev/dsp161, which is somewhat unsatisfactory.
> /dev/dsp16a, /dev/dsp16b works, but is rather unstandard.
Why not /dev/dsp16-2 (not that it's a very important issue -- how many
computers have two sound cards)?

> --Scott

-=- James Mastros

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:41    [W:0.035 / U:17.260 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site