![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
Eric Hoeltzel <eric@dogbert.sitewerks.com> writes: > Indeed. I just noticed that my 2.0.32 system is screwing up > timestamps on files on an NT server. I had never noticed this > before on 2.0.29 or 2.0.30. Is it possible that something has > changed with smbfs since 2.0.29, or did I just never notice > the problem before? One of the first things I learned about SMB is that "thou shalt have both machines syncronized to the same NTP master". Having system clocks out-of-sync while eg. doing a "make" on the client box causes all sorts of grief, especially if you were editing sources in a shell session on the server. If you're running stuff that isn't timestamp-sensitive, OTOH, you might get away with it. (Note that my experience was with a real server and an MS client; you have the opposite, so YMMV.) -- Anthony DeBoer <adb@onramp.ca> | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2005-03-22 12:41 [W:0.154 / U:0.010 seconds] ©2003-2008 Jasper Spaans | |||||||||||||