[lkml]   [1998]   [Jan]   [15]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [RFC]: linux/drivers/compression
On Thu, 15 Jan 1998, C. Scott Ananian wrote:

> IIRC, the linux kernel is *very* cautious about even *mentioning* any type
> of crypto because of the *extremely stringent* French crypto laws.
> Putting crypto hooks of any kind in the kernel could prevent French
> citizens from using Linux.
> --Scott

Whould these law allow generic block translation hooks? I.e. a module
could reg itself with loopback as being able to handle 'swapbytes'
translation. The mount call could pass to the loop the name of the desired
translation scheme and any possible options (like byte order)..

The kernel would ship with the swapbytes module.. Third parties and
distributions could include modules for encryption.

This would be just a generic translation hook.. No slanting for
encryption.. If you were to call this a hook for encryption you might as
well call the 'save' feature in apps 'a hook for encrpytion'...

Anyone want to send me (off the list), some urls about french encryption
laws? To me it feels like something of a human rights violation, I'd like
to know more..

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:41    [W:0.037 / U:5.204 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site