[lkml]   [1998]   [Jan]   [11]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: no need for a devfs
Kai Henningsen writes:
> (Phil Brutsche) wrote on 07.01.98 in <>:
> > No, please don't do this. It's too confusing. What's wrong with the
> > current SCSI setup (/dev/sda, /dev/sda1, /dev/sda2, etc) in any case?
> It's fragile. But then, so is the proposed replacement.

How is devfs fragile?

> What you probably really want is something like this:
> * for each partition, determine a unique id somehow (ext2 already has
> this, and so does FAT)
> * Use this id to identify the partition

Well, rather than some meaningless numerical ID, why not have a
human-understandable string as the unique ID? Hey! That's what devfs
uses! And you don't need /proc/discs because devfs has those entries.



 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:41    [W:0.084 / U:1.376 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site